Subject: Re: TAN: Movies [was Re: TAN: Shameless plug] From: Leigh D. Butler Organization: As Little As Possible Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written.robert-jordan NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.173.243.199 Apropos of nothing, on 7 Sep 2000 21:44:58 -0600 Jim Hill wrote: > Leigh D. Butler wrote: > > > >_X-Men_ was faboo > > Why the fuck are so many people praising this piece of shit? Are they > that fucking desperate to have a comic book movie that achieves the > trivial task of surpassing Joel Schumacher's "Batman" movies that > they'll overlook the crap story, the crap effects, and the complete > absence of Nightcrawler? Dear, dear Jim o' the Hill. _X-Men_ was not shit. I'm not going to claim it was World's Best Flick, but neither was it shit. I know, for I have seen shit. I have seen some serious shit, shit that would make you cringe in horror. Compared to even the more average shit out there, this movie doesn't come close to qualifying on my shit-o-meter. And besides, Hugh Jackman...well, shit. He's some hot shit. -- Leigh Butler dalton@concentric.net ************************************** I would like to state for the record that the word "shit" has by now lost all meaning to me. Shit.